Security assessment scoping and evidence worksheet

Define what an assessment must answer, gather evidence consistently, and separate verified findings from assumptions.

Isometric assessment worksheet, a magnifier and a checklist separating verified findings from assumptions.

How to use this resource

Intended for IT leaders, security teams, assessors, system owners, project managers, and procurement teams. Typical completion time: 60 to 120 minutes for initial scoping, followed by evidence collection.

  • Name the decision the assessment must support before collecting evidence.
  • Record the source, owner, date, and scope for each item of evidence.
  • Sample where full review is impractical, and document the selection method and limitation.
  • Distinguish a missing control from missing evidence. They are not the same conclusion.
  • Do not collect secrets or personal information unless the scope requires it and an approved handling method exists.
  • Record exclusions and unresolved questions in the final deliverable.

1. Assessment charter

  • FieldsAssessment title and identifier
  • FieldsExecutive sponsor
  • FieldsAssessment lead
  • FieldsBusiness and technical contacts
  • FieldsDecision or question this assessment must support
  • FieldsIn-scope business processes, systems, locations, data, identities, networks, cloud services, and third parties
  • FieldsExplicit exclusions
  • FieldsAssessment period and evidence cut-off date
  • FieldsRequired framework, contract, policy, or control reference, if any
  • FieldsPermitted methods and prohibited activities
  • FieldsEscalation contact for urgent findings
  • FieldsDeliverables, audience, and acceptance criteria

2. Environment context

  • PromptsWhich services or business processes are most important, and who owns them?
  • PromptsWhat data is created, received, stored, transmitted, backed up, and destroyed?
  • PromptsWhich identities, providers, sites, networks, and platforms support the scope?
  • PromptsWhat major changes occurred during the review period?
  • PromptsWhich legal, contractual, insurance, privacy, or records requirements has the organization already identified?
  • PromptsWhat previous assessments, incidents, outages, exceptions, or accepted risks are relevant?
  • PromptsWhich diagrams and inventories are current, and when were they last validated?

3. Control review domains

  • DomainsGovernance and ownershipReview prompts
    • Security responsibilities are assigned and understood.
    • Policies and standards have owners and review dates.
    • Exceptions and risk acceptance have expiry and approval.
    • Material suppliers and service dependencies have accountable owners.
    Example evidence
    • Role descriptions
    • policy register
    • risk register
    • exception records
    • committee records
  • DomainsAsset and service inventoryReview prompts
    • In-scope hardware, software, cloud resources, network devices, data stores, and service owners can be identified.
    • Inventory changes are maintained through a defined process.
    • Unsupported or unknown assets are investigated.
    Example evidence
    • Asset inventory
    • cloud inventory export
    • network discovery results
    • software inventory
    • service catalogue
  • DomainsIdentity and accessReview prompts
    • Joiner, mover, and leaver access is controlled.
    • Privileged access is separate, limited, and reviewed.
    • Strong authentication is applied according to risk.
    • Service accounts, secrets, and emergency access have owners and lifecycle controls.
    Example evidence
    • Identity configuration
    • access review sample
    • privileged group export
    • MFA policy
    • service-account register
    • offboarding sample
  • DomainsEndpoint, server, and platform securityReview prompts
    • Supported configurations and hardening expectations are defined.
    • Security updates are assessed and deployed through an owned process.
    • Endpoint protection coverage and health are monitored.
    • Administrative interfaces are restricted and logged.
    Example evidence
    • Configuration baseline
    • patch reports
    • endpoint coverage report
    • management network rules
    • exception tickets
  • DomainsNetwork securityReview prompts
    • Trust boundaries and externally exposed services are known.
    • Firewall and cloud network rules have owners, reasons, logging, and review dates.
    • Administrative access is restricted.
    • Remote access, wireless, DNS, VPN, and segmentation controls match documented requirements.
    Example evidence
    • Current diagrams
    • firewall exports
    • cloud security policies
    • VPN settings
    • wireless configuration
    • network access-control records
  • DomainsVulnerability and change managementReview prompts
    • Relevant vulnerabilities are identified, validated, prioritized, assigned, and tracked to closure or acceptance.
    • Changes are tested and approved according to risk.
    • Emergency changes receive review.
    • Rollback and post-change validation are part of production change records.
    Example evidence
    • Scan scope and results
    • remediation tickets
    • risk acceptance
    • change samples
    • emergency-change review
  • DomainsLogging, monitoring, and detectionReview prompts
    • Required security and administrative events are logged.
    • Time synchronization, retention, access, and integrity needs are defined.
    • Alerts have owners and tested response paths.
    • Coverage gaps and disabled sources are visible.
    Example evidence
    • Logging standard
    • source inventory
    • retention settings
    • alert sample
    • on-call record
    • detection test evidence
  • DomainsData protection and privacy supportReview prompts
    • Sensitive data locations and transfers are understood within scope.
    • Access, retention, disposal, encryption, and backup practices reflect approved requirements.
    • Privacy or legal specialists are involved where interpretation is required.
    Example evidence
    • Data-flow diagram
    • classification standard
    • retention schedule
    • encryption settings
    • disposal records
    • privacy review
  • DomainsThird-party and cloud servicesReview prompts
    • Security responsibilities between the organization and provider are understood.
    • Critical providers have current contacts, dependencies, and exit or recovery considerations.
    • Contractual security requirements and evidence are tracked by appropriate owners.
    Example evidence
    • Responsibility matrix
    • contracts or requirement extracts
    • assurance reports
    • provider incident process
    • dependency register
  • DomainsIncident responseReview prompts
    • Roles, declaration authority, communications, evidence handling, and external contacts are documented.
    • The plan addresses loss of normal identity, email, or network services.
    • Exercises produce owned actions and plan updates.
    Example evidence
    • Incident plan
    • contact list
    • call tree test
    • exercise record
    • after-action items
    • forensic readiness notes
  • DomainsBackup, continuity, and recoveryReview prompts
    • Business owners have defined recovery objectives and acceptable data loss.
    • Backups, credentials, documentation, and recovery infrastructure are protected from common failure modes.
    • Complete service recovery is tested and evidenced, not inferred from backup-job success.
    Example evidence
    • Recovery objectives
    • backup policy
    • job and immutability settings
    • restore-test record
    • dependency map
    • recovery runbook
  • DomainsSecurity awareness and operational readinessReview prompts
    • People receive role-appropriate guidance.
    • Reporting channels are easy to find and tested.
    • Administrators and responders rehearse tasks that differ from normal operations.
    Example evidence
    • Training record
    • reporting procedure
    • phishing-report workflow
    • administrator exercise
    • lessons learned

4. Evidence register

  • Repeatable columnsEvidence ID
  • Repeatable columnsDomain
  • Repeatable columnsDescription
  • Repeatable columnsSource system or custodian
  • Repeatable columnsOwner
  • Repeatable columnsCollection date
  • Repeatable columnsPeriod covered
  • Repeatable columnsIntegrity or export notes
  • Repeatable columnsSensitivity
  • Repeatable columnsStorage location
  • Repeatable columnsReviewer
  • Repeatable columnsEvidence status
  • Repeatable columnsRelated finding IDs

5. Finding record

  • Repeatable fieldsFinding ID and title
  • Repeatable fieldsAffected scope
  • Repeatable fieldsCondition observed
  • Repeatable fieldsEvidence IDs
  • Repeatable fieldsExpected control or requirement and source
  • Repeatable fieldsThreat or failure scenario
  • Repeatable fieldsBusiness and technical consequence
  • Repeatable fieldsLikelihood and impact rationale
  • Repeatable fieldsExisting and compensating controls
  • Repeatable fieldsRisk rating using the approved method
  • Repeatable fieldsRecommendation
  • Repeatable fieldsAlternative options
  • Repeatable fieldsDependencies and change risk
  • Repeatable fieldsOwner
  • Repeatable fieldsTarget date
  • Repeatable fieldsManagement response
  • Repeatable fieldsException or acceptance approval and expiry
  • Repeatable fieldsClosure evidence
  • Repeatable fieldsValidation date and reviewer

6. Quality and closeout checks

  • ChecklistEvery conclusion is tied to evidence or clearly labelled as unverified.
  • ChecklistThe report states scope, exclusions, dates, methods, sampling, and access limitations.
  • ChecklistFactual accuracy was reviewed by appropriate system owners without allowing owners to erase supported findings.
  • ChecklistUrgent issues were escalated through the agreed path.
  • ChecklistRecommendations include dependencies and operational risk where known.
  • ChecklistActions have owners; accepted risks have authority, rationale, and review dates.
  • ChecklistSensitive working material is retained or disposed of according to the engagement terms.
  • ChecklistThe final report does not claim certification, legal compliance, or complete security unless a qualified and authorized process supports that exact claim.

Important limitations

For general operational use only. These materials are not legal advice, compliance advice, a warranty, or a complete control framework. Using a template does not establish that a change, assessment, incident plan, or recovery capability is adequate. Obtain appropriate technical, legal, privacy, insurance, and regulatory advice for your circumstances.

  • This worksheet supports structured review. It is not, by itself, a security standard, audit opinion, certification, or determination of legal compliance.
  • Do not place passwords, private keys, recovery codes, sensitive personal information, or unredacted secrets in forms, worksheets, tickets, or email. Use an approved secure channel for confidential material.
  • Resource version 1.0. Suggested download filename: hai-security-assessment-worksheet.html.

The workbook has one tab per section, with locked guidance, blank entry cells and validated dropdowns. Review and adapt this template before operational use.

Need a second set of eyes on a security or infrastructure decision?

Describe the environment, the risk and the outcome you need. The first conversation is a free initial consultation, with no obligation to go further.

Contact HAI Consulting